Kudos to FFFFound.com
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Monday, March 16, 2009
Equality on the Micro Level
Sometimes the best examples of some of the most controversial issues comes in the forms of simple circumstances.
Take equality for instance:
I had entered my class today expecting to receive my test results from the previous week (One of those tests you don't want to see, but must face head on). Upon sitting in my desk, I had noticed that the board indicated that our test was to be given at the end of class. Having that knowledge I gladly accepted, and welcomed the next 3 hours of note-taking.
During the first half of the hour, our teacher had given us the reason for why he/she decided to withhold our tests till the end of class.
"My intentions of giving you your tests back are because I don't want to disorient your note taking (Keep in mind this teacher is prudent about sharing his degree in education). However, your class received the most A's out of all of my classes."
And my teacher began to read the students who received A's on the test.
Student 1, Student 2, Student 3... and so on.
Now in the midst of this welcomed silence, I had suddenly realized that my own teacher had committed a mistake. In the aftermath of the name calling for the A recipients, there was a chaotic atmosphere that filled the room. A once neutral and equal room had shifted into a classroom that consisted of two opposing elements, comfort and stress.
Comfort because those who had earned their A's were now clear of stress; and were then able to carry on with the torturous note taking without problem.
Stress because those who had not had their named called were now taken from their temporary comfort and forced into a zone where their grades were now limited to lesser degrees.
I turned to my classmate and asked if I was crazy about this quick little theory, and if it was justified enough to raise my hand and call my teacher out for.
Just the look in his face gave me the answer I needed.
I assertively raised my hand and politely spoke:
"Not that I am bitter about not receiving an A, but don't you(the teacher) believe that by calling out the A's you have now disoriented your students?"
In which my teacher replied:
"I'm glad you asked that question (sound like many of our politicians?). I simply gave out the A's because it would allow the rest of the class to locate the students who they could possibly study with." The rest of his response, in respect, was completely off the target of answering my inquiry.
Now let me just remind you, the question I raised was NOT a question of important degree. Rather, it was a legitimate question that aimed to support my teacher's initial theory. My aim was not to belittle my teacher, to humiliate him/her, or disrupt class. It was meant to clarify what his/her theory actually meant.
My teacher's response was illogical and somewhat depressing.
I looked at all the students in the room and found most silent, yet pleased to know a student other than him/herself felt subordinate.
I didn't follow my teachers response with another question, rather I simply knew from his response and physical actions that I had made my point clear and understood. Also our "mini breaks" are five minute breaks, which probably only allow one question and answer to be addressed.
For the next 2 1/2 hours, I wrote my notes, watched a video about mud, and thought about whether or not I had received a B, C, D, or F. My notes were unreadable, my eyes wondered away from the television and into my thoughts, and for a good period of time, I was a paranoid student. It was discomforting.
Towards the end of class, my teacher laid out the tests upon the counter and told us to pick it up. There were those who confidently rose and headed towards the counter, and those who hesitantly awaited an unknown future. Again, there was an inequality.
After class, numerous students confronted me and thanked me. They explained how for a lack of a better word, "shitty" they felt up until they had received their test. I simply thanked them for letting me know, and said it allowed me to feel a little more sane for raising and questioning my teacher.
In the beginning we were all equal.
However, somewhere along the line an authoritarian source (the teacher) segregated and gave privilege to those with favorable traits (Those with A's), which was justified on the grounds of an illogical belief.
These favorable trait carriers leisurely carried on with their plans, confident and comfortable.
This created a micro-level of chaos within those whom did not carry these favorable traits. Giving way to negative feelings and emotions, which could have deprived them of the activities and dampened their confidence of carrying on.
Ironically in the end, we all ended up where we were in the first place, equal.
We had all received our grades.
It didn't matter whether we had received an F.
It mattered that we received our tests at the same time.
Could this be how equality is experienced on the macro level?
Thankfully, in my example, we are eventually equal in the end.
But for some, this equality takes years, decades, or even generations to occur.
Lesson learned.
Question authority, Demand answers, and Advocate for what is of Justice and Equality.
Eventually, Liberty will not be a trait for the few, but a natural right for the many.
And if you're wondering if I wrote this because I received a bad grade, I got a B-.
Take equality for instance:
I had entered my class today expecting to receive my test results from the previous week (One of those tests you don't want to see, but must face head on). Upon sitting in my desk, I had noticed that the board indicated that our test was to be given at the end of class. Having that knowledge I gladly accepted, and welcomed the next 3 hours of note-taking.
During the first half of the hour, our teacher had given us the reason for why he/she decided to withhold our tests till the end of class.
"My intentions of giving you your tests back are because I don't want to disorient your note taking (Keep in mind this teacher is prudent about sharing his degree in education). However, your class received the most A's out of all of my classes."
And my teacher began to read the students who received A's on the test.
Student 1, Student 2, Student 3... and so on.
Now in the midst of this welcomed silence, I had suddenly realized that my own teacher had committed a mistake. In the aftermath of the name calling for the A recipients, there was a chaotic atmosphere that filled the room. A once neutral and equal room had shifted into a classroom that consisted of two opposing elements, comfort and stress.
Comfort because those who had earned their A's were now clear of stress; and were then able to carry on with the torturous note taking without problem.
Stress because those who had not had their named called were now taken from their temporary comfort and forced into a zone where their grades were now limited to lesser degrees.
I turned to my classmate and asked if I was crazy about this quick little theory, and if it was justified enough to raise my hand and call my teacher out for.
Just the look in his face gave me the answer I needed.
I assertively raised my hand and politely spoke:
"Not that I am bitter about not receiving an A, but don't you(the teacher) believe that by calling out the A's you have now disoriented your students?"
In which my teacher replied:
"I'm glad you asked that question (sound like many of our politicians?). I simply gave out the A's because it would allow the rest of the class to locate the students who they could possibly study with." The rest of his response, in respect, was completely off the target of answering my inquiry.
Now let me just remind you, the question I raised was NOT a question of important degree. Rather, it was a legitimate question that aimed to support my teacher's initial theory. My aim was not to belittle my teacher, to humiliate him/her, or disrupt class. It was meant to clarify what his/her theory actually meant.
My teacher's response was illogical and somewhat depressing.
I looked at all the students in the room and found most silent, yet pleased to know a student other than him/herself felt subordinate.
I didn't follow my teachers response with another question, rather I simply knew from his response and physical actions that I had made my point clear and understood. Also our "mini breaks" are five minute breaks, which probably only allow one question and answer to be addressed.
For the next 2 1/2 hours, I wrote my notes, watched a video about mud, and thought about whether or not I had received a B, C, D, or F. My notes were unreadable, my eyes wondered away from the television and into my thoughts, and for a good period of time, I was a paranoid student. It was discomforting.
Towards the end of class, my teacher laid out the tests upon the counter and told us to pick it up. There were those who confidently rose and headed towards the counter, and those who hesitantly awaited an unknown future. Again, there was an inequality.
After class, numerous students confronted me and thanked me. They explained how for a lack of a better word, "shitty" they felt up until they had received their test. I simply thanked them for letting me know, and said it allowed me to feel a little more sane for raising and questioning my teacher.
In the beginning we were all equal.
However, somewhere along the line an authoritarian source (the teacher) segregated and gave privilege to those with favorable traits (Those with A's), which was justified on the grounds of an illogical belief.
These favorable trait carriers leisurely carried on with their plans, confident and comfortable.
This created a micro-level of chaos within those whom did not carry these favorable traits. Giving way to negative feelings and emotions, which could have deprived them of the activities and dampened their confidence of carrying on.
Ironically in the end, we all ended up where we were in the first place, equal.
We had all received our grades.
It didn't matter whether we had received an F.
It mattered that we received our tests at the same time.
Could this be how equality is experienced on the macro level?
Thankfully, in my example, we are eventually equal in the end.
But for some, this equality takes years, decades, or even generations to occur.
Lesson learned.
Question authority, Demand answers, and Advocate for what is of Justice and Equality.
Eventually, Liberty will not be a trait for the few, but a natural right for the many.
And if you're wondering if I wrote this because I received a bad grade, I got a B-.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Obama Speech 2/25
Yeah yeah I was at work.
Lets just say I was living Obama's speech.
Lets just say I was living Obama's speech.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Monday, February 16, 2009
Congratulations Hugo Chavez!
In a decisive victory for Huge Chavez, Venezuelans narrowly voted 54% to support a constitutional referendum that allows unlimited term limits for the Presidency.
So here is my congratulatory letter to President Hugo Chavez.
Compliments Huge Chavez!
For your graduation from President to Dictator!
Its going to be a pleasure seeing you in power for the next three decades or so.
Sincerely,
Alexander Shahparnia
P.S- This is madness.
So here is my congratulatory letter to President Hugo Chavez.
Compliments Huge Chavez!
For your graduation from President to Dictator!
Its going to be a pleasure seeing you in power for the next three decades or so.
Sincerely,
Alexander Shahparnia
P.S- This is madness.
Sunday, February 8, 2009
Take My Eyes But Not The Shirt!
Yes, if your a fan of Forgetting Sarah Marshall, you probably recognized that unforgettable quote.
But there's always a reason for everything.
Folks,
I was watching my news sources the other day when I heard the ridiculous price tag of the Economic Stimulus Package.
(Right now, it is about 720 Billion Dollars)
And it got me thinking.
Where the heck are we going to get 720 billion dollars worth of this material?
Answer:
Well money is made of cotton and linen. To be exact, 75% cotton and 25% Linen.
So, the answers are pretty simple.
1. Nationalize every cotton and linen store in the country.
(Is this why my local Linen's and Things ran out of business?)
2. Call on every American to donate their cottons and linens to the Crane Paper company, who manufactures the paper money.
Yes America, I know its hard, but it's time we all round up our baby blankets and Ed Hardy shirts.
Criminalize quilting.
And for once in our lives, purchase that silk suit we've been dying to get.(But never had a valid reason too)
Sadly though, our country has developed a plan B to my A.
And if you think my plan is crazy, just listen to this one.
America has managed to find a way to print 720 billion dollars, devalue our money, and save your precious linens at the same time.
(While staying environmentally friendly as well!)
You see, only 3% of our money is actually tangible... leaving 97% digital.
Therefore, we are going to pull a Chris Angel, create 720 billion dollars out from
"credit", and condense it into digital convenience.
So the next time you need to borrow money, just punch your computer, television, or Leap Frog learning system.
Better yet, just take your hands, and start snatching our bills out of thin air.
Because America, in our country, we don't need physical proof to know somethings out there. (Take Iraq's weapons of mass destruction for example)
We've got something called faith.
And when you've got faith, anything is possible.
Ain't that something.
But there's always a reason for everything.
Folks,
I was watching my news sources the other day when I heard the ridiculous price tag of the Economic Stimulus Package.
(Right now, it is about 720 Billion Dollars)
And it got me thinking.
Where the heck are we going to get 720 billion dollars worth of this material?
Answer:
Well money is made of cotton and linen. To be exact, 75% cotton and 25% Linen.
So, the answers are pretty simple.
1. Nationalize every cotton and linen store in the country.
(Is this why my local Linen's and Things ran out of business?)
2. Call on every American to donate their cottons and linens to the Crane Paper company, who manufactures the paper money.
Yes America, I know its hard, but it's time we all round up our baby blankets and Ed Hardy shirts.
Criminalize quilting.
And for once in our lives, purchase that silk suit we've been dying to get.(But never had a valid reason too)
Sadly though, our country has developed a plan B to my A.
And if you think my plan is crazy, just listen to this one.
America has managed to find a way to print 720 billion dollars, devalue our money, and save your precious linens at the same time.
(While staying environmentally friendly as well!)
You see, only 3% of our money is actually tangible... leaving 97% digital.
Therefore, we are going to pull a Chris Angel, create 720 billion dollars out from
"credit", and condense it into digital convenience.
So the next time you need to borrow money, just punch your computer, television, or Leap Frog learning system.
Better yet, just take your hands, and start snatching our bills out of thin air.
Because America, in our country, we don't need physical proof to know somethings out there. (Take Iraq's weapons of mass destruction for example)
We've got something called faith.
And when you've got faith, anything is possible.
Ain't that something.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Barack Obama and the Double Edged Sword
Sounds like a flick that may be out in theaters this summer right?
Wrong.
It's really the continuing criticism that President Obama has been receiving about his nominations; and how his administration is suffering through their goal of attempting to establish a "transparent" government.
Now you know me, I'm all about transparency.
If my government is cookin' something, I wanna know what it is, and if I'll be able to sample it. (For example, our previous "stimulus" bill tasted horrible... but then again it was shoved down my throat without permission, and yours.)
However recently, the media has been super nosy.
I mean so nosy that our poor President cannot even begin to simmer any ingredients together without someone shouting "Too much salt!" or "Remove the carrots!"
I mean holy crabs. (See picture to the right for an image)
The guys only been on the job for 2 hours, and yet it is as if the man has done more Pwrong doings than Bush has done in his entire presidency! (For a quick but fair synopsis of Bush's mistakes, please refer to 2005's "V for Vendetta".
Now I'm not saying President Obama's recent nominations are not worthy of criticism.
Yes, he's had about 200 nominations go sour.
However, give the President some credit!
The fact that he has owned up to every mistake is in every right a step towards developing government accountability.
And now that we have an open and honest* President, the man has become completely vulnerable.
I mean, where did this enthusiasm come from all of a sudden?
Do we really reward honesty negatively?
Heres the deal:
Mistakes are made, they are always going to be made.
There is no Trail without Error.
It is impossible to take a step in the right direction without encountering obstacles.
(Just take Dorothy and the Yellow Brick Road for example.)
Having that said, it is better to start finding solutions to these obstacles rather than interrogating them and wasting valuable time and money.
A solution does not mean giving birth to controversy and chaos.
It means moving solving and executing a previous "failure".
If you enjoy dwelling upon "failure", then with all due respect be my guest.
But for the rest of us who would like to see our country a little more productive, lets carry on with business and move ahead.
* denotes honesty on a contingent basis.
Wrong.
It's really the continuing criticism that President Obama has been receiving about his nominations; and how his administration is suffering through their goal of attempting to establish a "transparent" government.
Now you know me, I'm all about transparency.
If my government is cookin' something, I wanna know what it is, and if I'll be able to sample it. (For example, our previous "stimulus" bill tasted horrible... but then again it was shoved down my throat without permission, and yours.)
However recently, the media has been super nosy.
I mean so nosy that our poor President cannot even begin to simmer any ingredients together without someone shouting "Too much salt!" or "Remove the carrots!"
I mean holy crabs. (See picture to the right for an image)
The guys only been on the job for 2 hours, and yet it is as if the man has done more Pwrong doings than Bush has done in his entire presidency! (For a quick but fair synopsis of Bush's mistakes, please refer to 2005's "V for Vendetta".
Now I'm not saying President Obama's recent nominations are not worthy of criticism.
Yes, he's had about 200 nominations go sour.
However, give the President some credit!
The fact that he has owned up to every mistake is in every right a step towards developing government accountability.
And now that we have an open and honest* President, the man has become completely vulnerable.
I mean, where did this enthusiasm come from all of a sudden?
Do we really reward honesty negatively?
Heres the deal:
Mistakes are made, they are always going to be made.
There is no Trail without Error.
It is impossible to take a step in the right direction without encountering obstacles.
(Just take Dorothy and the Yellow Brick Road for example.)
Having that said, it is better to start finding solutions to these obstacles rather than interrogating them and wasting valuable time and money.
A solution does not mean giving birth to controversy and chaos.
It means moving solving and executing a previous "failure".
If you enjoy dwelling upon "failure", then with all due respect be my guest.
But for the rest of us who would like to see our country a little more productive, lets carry on with business and move ahead.
* denotes honesty on a contingent basis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
